Chapter 50
Burying Evidence and Classifying Documents
article

Nothing Protects Secrets
Like a 'National Security' Stamp
First, demystify the peculiarity of existence—the truth.
Unfair, unfiltered, and uninhibited, it has a way of unraveling the seams of the power-hungry, and what could be more dangerous than that?
Let’s focus on the grand art of obfuscation.
Politicians are like magicians at a third-rate birthday party, performing sleights of hand that even the most gullible children would question.
Imagine evidence as an inquisitive rat darting through halls of deceit.
To harness this chaos, concoct a labyrinth—a twisted maze of misdirected paperwork.
Let your press release be a tidal wave of irrelevant data, peppered with euphemisms and distraction.
If someone dares to question the audio tape of your clandestine dealings with a notorious mobster, shrug and pivot to your “exemplary community service”—as if anyone asked about your noble charity run for the neighborhood dogs.
But don’t just stop at confusion; classify it like a seasoned operative.
There’s nothing quite like slapping that “Classified” stamp on an inconvenient truth to inject it with a sense of urgency and importance.
“Sensitive to National Security”?
Yes, please! Turn that evidence into a riddle wrapped in a enigma, cloaked in red tape.
The populace doesn’t ask where the bodies are buried when they’re too busy being terrified of the ‘big bad wolf’ that is national security.
Wield phrases like “grave threats” with the gusto of a cinematic villain, and suddenly, every curious journalist is not merely nosy, but a potential traitor, outing your administration’s well-guarded secrets.
Now, let’s talk about climate control—fear, that is.
Need to silence dissent?
Simply scream “national sovereignty” on a megaphone and have legions of loyalists peering over their shoulders.
Finger-pointing won’t just save your hide; it’ll turn you into a focus of the people’s ire.
Just label a daring journalist a “dangerous provocateur” or an “enemy of the state,” then watch the masses lunge for their pitchforks.
Nothing distracts from a politician's corruption quite like a well-chosen scapegoat—preferably someone too irrelevant for charm but too close for comfort.
“They want to tear us apart!” becomes the rallying cry, and like fabled sheep, the voters will follow you right off a cliff.
And when the pressure mounts, remember the sweet elixir of denial.
Don’t just deny the allegations; lie with style and panache.
Elude the truth as if it’s an embarrassed ex-lover; “That was my cousin, you know, the one who sounds like a drunk pirate!” Glittering under the guise of inoffensiveness, you’ll remain impervious, because the populace has a memory as fleeting as a Snapchat story.
No trace of evidence will cling in the air long enough for them to care.
Congratulations! Now, with truth buried deeper than a mobster’s secret stash, pour yourself a drink.
Your polling numbers will inflate like a balloon at a child’s party while citizens blissfully applaud your spectacle.
Meanwhile, behind the curtain, the chaos of the political circus thrives.
You might just be the grand puppeteer, but remember: the congregation of loyal supporters is merely the audience, and clowns have a way of making the slapstick look all too enticing.
But let this be your rotten wake-up call.
The lesson for you, the voter, is this: the “insurmountable” walls of national security conceal layers of betrayal.
It’s not just politics—it’s a manipulation of trust, veiling the truth beneath a slick veneer of deception.
While not all judges or law enforcement officers are part of this sordid play, they are increasingly surrounded by the obedient sycophants politicians choose over integrity.
Learn to dissect the packaging of the next monumental ‘security’-driven decision.
Hold your elected officials accountable, ask the hard questions, and refuse to be swept into the seduction of silence.
If you don’t, you’ll find yourself cheering as the very foundations of democracy crumble beneath the weight of corruption, all while thinking it’s just another play in the great political theater.